Chiefs’ kicker Harrison Butker opened his mouth about his private beliefs during a commencement address, making them public. Despite being at a small college where his outdated views find support, they were publicized for all to hear. It’s likely he was aware of this. He criticized IVF, spoke against Pride month, and tiptoed into anti-semitic rhetoric, albeit indirectly.
His priority, however, was telling women who had just graduated about their ‘vocation’ as homemakers.
Yeah, I know. Sounds like he was auditioning for a role in a 1950s sitcom.
This statement reduces women to stereotypes, diminishing their value, overlooking their abilities, ambitions and contributions. It’s a narrow, outdated view of women’s roles that usually does nothing but creates a toxic environment and more animosity towards those who challenge traditional gender roles.
It’s like trying to fit a smartphone into a rotary phone’s case—outdated, impractical, and sure to cause friction.
His defenders argue for his freedom of speech. Sure. While he has that right, does it shield him from criticism? Does his freedom of speech override mine when I want to challenge his antiquated views?
Heck no.
But why the hysteria over a football kicker’s isolated views? He’s not anyone important. Just an ultra-religious guy, right?
The issue is the increasing mainstream presence of such views, with more public figures speaking against women’s rights in recent years. This makes him part of the problem.
Any normalization of backward views is dangerous, can have far-reaching effects, influencing policy decisions. While everyone is entitled to their beliefs, the platform and visibility of public figures like Butker can amplify these views, giving them legitimacy.
It’s important these people get called out for their extreme views over and over. So, I’m doing my part.
—
image cr: pixabay
Silvia Writes 